Home » Fine Art Periods » Rococo » Decline and Legacy » Criticism of Frivolity
Criticism of frivolity played a significant role in the decline of Rococo art during the Rococo period.
Rococo art faced growing criticism from intellectuals, philosophers, and cultural commentators who viewed it as frivolous, superficial, and lacking in substance. Critics argued that Rococo artists prioritized decorative ornamentation and visual spectacle over deeper moral, philosophical, or social themes.
Some critics expressed moral concerns about the decadence and hedonism depicted in Rococo art. They viewed the extravagant lifestyles and amorous escapades depicted in Rococo paintings as emblematic of a corrupt and morally bankrupt society, particularly in the context of widening social inequalities and economic disparities.
Satirical works of art, literature, and commentary often lampooned the excesses and absurdities of Rococo culture. Artists such as William Hogarth in England and Antoine Watteau in France produced satirical works that caricatured the frivolity, pretensions, and follies of the Rococo elite, highlighting the moral and social absurdities of their world.
Rococo art came to be seen as symptomatic of broader cultural trends and values that were increasingly questioned and critiqued in the late 18th century. Critics argued that the obsession with luxury, pleasure, and surface ornamentation reflected a society that was out of touch with deeper moral and intellectual concerns, particularly in the face of political and social upheaval.
As intellectual and cultural currents shifted towards the ideals of the Enlightenment, there was a growing desire for art that was more intellectually rigorous, morally edifying, and socially relevant. Critics called for a return to the principles of classical art, with its emphasis on truth, reason, and moral rectitude, as an antidote to the perceived decadence of the Rococo style.
Overall, criticism of frivolity played a central role in the decline of Rococo art during the Rococo period, reflecting broader cultural anxieties and intellectual discontent with the values and aesthetic sensibilities of the time. As artistic tastes shifted towards more serious, morally engaged, and intellectually stimulating forms of art, the frivolous excesses of the Rococo style fell out of favor, hastening its decline.